ONheader

barheader

Ruysdael


Salomon van Ruysdael
(Naarden 1600/02 – 1670 Haarlem)

Dune landscape with farmers

signed and dated lower center: S.V. Ruylsdall. 1629.
oil on panel
16 x 23 ⅞ inches (40.5 x 58 cm.)

Provenance:
Private Collection, Germany, ca. 1971-1995; Galerie Sanct Lucas, Vienna, 1995; Private Collection, Boston, 1995-2006.

Literature:
W. Stechow, Salomon van Ruysdael. Eine Einfhrung in seine Kunst (Berlin, 1975), p. 103, no. 228A.

Salomon van Ruysdael was born in Naarden around 1600-1602.  His earliest known dated painting is the View of the Horse Market at Valkenburg from 1626. 1.  Merely two years later, his landscapes were praised by the chronicler Samuel van Ampzing in his Description and Praise of the town of Haarlem.  It is unknown with whom the artist trained, but his early works show the influence of Esaias van de Velde who worked in Haarlem from 1609 to 1618.  Alongside Pieter Molijn, Jan van Goyen, Pieter van Santvoort and others, van Ruysdael played an important role in establishing the tonal dune landscape that is often considered to be one of the greatest achievements in seventeenth century Dutch painting. 

The present work was executed during a unique time in the history of Dutch painting when artists began to develop a more naturalistic depiction of nature.  The composition of Dune landscape with farmers, as well as the color palette and receding diagonals are typical features of works by van Ruysdael from the late 1620s.  Many of the paintings from this period reflect the artist’s rich observation and unembellished portrayal of the sandy, undulating terrain bordering Haarlem.

In this pleasantly tranquil scene, van Ruysdael seems to have followed Karel van Mander’s advice regarding landscape painting: “But above all do not forget…make the countryside, the town, and the water full of activity, the houses inhabited and the roads traveled.” 2.  Two shepherds rest on the sandy dunes in the foreground, while others can be seen on the summit of the grassy knoll.  In the middle distance, two farmers busily repair the thatched roof of a rustic barn.  A man walks along the meandering path leading towards a distant church steeple in the left distance.  Van Ruysdael adopted an artistic device developed by Pieter Molijn in depicting dunes: a diagonal line extends from the foreground to the middle distance, and then moves in the opposite direction to the background.  Van Ruysdael enhanced this formula by including a rickety old fence in the middle distance, a compositional device that is intended to lead the viewer’s eye from the yellow-brown foreground, to the bluish-green trees in the middle, and then deep into the background.  

During the seventeenth century, an interest in humble subject matter and the carefree simplicity of rustic life was popular among upper-class art collectors.  Literature of the time frequently acknowledged the positive aspect of leisure as a recuperative interlude between periods of productivity. 3.   In a poem accompanying a series of landscape prints with farmers and peasants from 1614, an obscure seventeenth century poet, G. Ryckius, wrote: “Most happy is he and truly blessed is the one who may spend his years free of burgher cares, so long as he lives securely under the thatched roof of his hut; his spirit does not become entangled by complications, his will does not wrestle in a heart filled with doubt, but remains happy, content with the possessions of his fathers…most happy is he and in the highest measure blessed.” 4.  

Also popular among art collectors was the monochromatic, or tonal, style which proliferated Dutch painting during the 1620s–50s.  Traditionally, this trend was attributed exclusively to changes in taste.  However, scholars have recently set forth more thoroughly researched explanations.  John Michael Montias related the rise in popularity of tonal painting to artists’ quest to lower their production costs, while also satisfying new market demands. 5.   Jonathan Israel expanded this theory and linked the monochromatic phase to historical events, namely the economic recession during the 1620s that forced Dutch artists to produce more reasonably priced paintings. 6.   Conversely, Eric Jan Sluijter proposed that Dutch painters developed their tonal techniques to compete with Flemish artists. 7.  Nevertheless, Dune landscape with farmers is a superb example of Dutch seventeenth century tonal landscape painting.

1. Wolfgang Stechow, Dutch Landscape Painting of the Seventeenth Century, London, 1975, (no. 136A, fig. 1).
2. Karel van Mander, Den Grondt, ch. 8, pp. 41-42 (quoted from the translation in Walford 1991, p.27).
3. Peter Sutton, Masters of 17th Century Dutch Landscape Painting, Boston, 1987, p. 36.
4. F.W.H. Hollstein, Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings, and Woodcuts, Amsterdam, 1949, nos. 420-438. Poem translated by Alison McNeil Kettering, 5. The Dutch Arcadia: Pastoral Art and Its Audience in the Golden Age, Montclair, 1983, p.158.
6. John Michael Montias, “The Influence of Economic Factors on Style,” De Zeventiende Eeuw 6 (1990): 49-57.
6. Jonathan Israel, “Adjusting to Hard Times: Dutch Art During Its Period of Crisis and Restructuring (c. 1621-c. 1645),” Art History 20(1997): 449-76.
7. Eric Jan Sluijter, “Over Brabantse vodden, economische concurrentie, artistieke wedijver en de groei van de markt voor schilderijen in de eerste decennia van de zeventiende eeuw,” In Falkenburg et al. 1999, pp. 113-43.

barheader